Miranda v. Arizona generally requires that certain warnings be given before questioning a person who is in police custody. But how about a prisoner who is serving a sentence, and thus in custody 24/7, who taken into a room and questioned? Are Miranda warnings required then? Today, in Howes v. Fields, the US Supreme Court said nope.

Tags: General con law

This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 21st, 2012 at 11:09 am and is filed under Editorial, Of Arms and the Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Source Site: http://armsandthelaw.com/